Sitio web pana
Inicio
Samuel A. Nigro, M.D.
Social Justice 76 May/June 2001
WHY HOMOSEXUALITY IS A DISORDER
SAMUEL A. NIGRO, M.D.
A disease is
any deviation from or interruption of the normal structure or function of a
part, organ or system of the body as manifested by characteristic symptoms and
signs: the etiology, pathology and prognosis may be known or unknown.
A disorder
is a derangement or abnormality of function; a morbid physical or mental state.
Diagnosis:
the determination of the nature of acme of disease; the all of distinguishing
one disease from another.
— Dorland's
Illustrated Medical Dictionary
Homosexuality:
exclusive or predominant sexual attraction to persons of the same sex with or
without physical relationship. Record homosexuality as a diagnosis whether or
not it is considered as a mental disorder
— International
Classification of Disease,
(9th
Revision, 5th edition, 2000)
Appendix B,
p. 646.
In all society, in medicine, a
disease is a disease, and a disorder is a disorder. From limp to stutter, most
people can sense something is wrong when it is wrong. It is unpardonable to
deny what is known and inhumane to collude in what is a serious injury to the
body and to mental health. Of course, it is courteous to pretend that you did
not see what you saw. It is decent to be tolerant and supportive of anyone affected
and disabled in any way. But with courtesy or decency or not, a disorder is a
disorder. Acknowledgement of such a disorder is not rejection or condemnation
but truth. But unlike most people with other disabilities, activist gays
("homosexuals" in this paper except where noted) do not want support
or help with adjustment but want a dishonest pretending that there is no
disorder. But as with all disorders, the degree of the disorder usually is
directly proportional to the obviousness of it and the denial about it.
Mankind has a terrible tendency to
abuse the planet. The number of environmental planetary catastrophes created by
man are too many to enumerate exhaustively. But a few come to mind quickly such
as DDT, ozone, cigarette smoke, IUDs and oil spills. Similarly, the
"pill" will also be found to have far more delayed detrimental
effects and may include not only increases in breast cancer and diseases of
women but a hormonal disruption of intrauterine fetal development predisposing
to early puberty in girls, feminization of boys and homosexuality. No doubt,
the biochemical intricacies will be identified in time although there is a
massive longstanding insolent conspiracy to ignore the potential hazards of
reproductive innovations. Incontrovertibly the history of mankind is to pollute
the planet unwittingly, in spite of best intentions including the [line missing]
However, mankind's tendency to pollute the planet is not only in the
biochemical sphere but in the ethological realm also.
In all nature, sexuality is for
reproduction. For humans, this means procreation and unition in support of the
family. In this regard, mankind's emphasis on orgasm (sterile
"ejaculation," i.e., jaculasis) is another example of human
bankruptcy incompatible with the animal kingdom in nature. To emphasize a
simple neurophysiologic reflex as a method of self-identity is a violation of
humanity and fragmentation of humans from themselves, the species itself, the
entire animal kingdom and all nature. No species could survive imitating human
sexuality. The fruitless non-procreative and non-unitive (non-marital for
humans) emphasis on sexual squirting is unplanetary.
In my 1994 pamphlet, Homosexuality, a Disease and for Gays, a
Cult, homosexuality was subsumed under the generic term:
"jaculasis" i.e., an involuntary, emotional, repetition-compulsion of
a nonreproductive (and, therefore, "perverse" according to Freud)
ejaculation reflex voluntarily professed to be essential to one's identity
including all other paraphilias and related disorders.
Because jaculasis is a deviation
and derangement of normal sexual function in that it is not reproductive but is
excretory (relief) in activity, it should be recognized as "sexcretion,"
i.e., abnormal sexual behavior serving not a sexual, but a pseudoexcretory
function. While excretory pseudosexual squirting is almost a social mos today,
the common cognitive defect is in not recognizing that for all creatures on the
planet and in the animal kingdom, real sexuality is only for reproduction
(procreation and unition). Thus, sexcretion (especially jaculasis, i.e., the
misappropriation of the male ejaculatory reflex) is another example of
mankind's pervasive polluting of the planet. The "squirt-relief" sexcretory
culture rampant today is unnatural, antienvironmental and pollution when
compared to the rest of the animal kingdom for both homosexuals and
heterosexuals in contemporary life.
Especially for females,
non-reproductive sex is unfemale and "orgasm" is a pure atavistic
imitation of the male ejaculatory response. Females "ejaculating"
(orgasm) like males is not a natural phenomenon in the animal kingdom and is a
rejection of female specialness replacing it by maleness. However, females are
very vulnerable sexually. It appears that once females find out the male
pleasure associated with playing with their penis remanent (the clitoris), they
embrace a phenomenon totally out of synchrony with all other femaleness on the
planet and they love it, i.e., being a "squirting man." In this
regard, women are against themselves and the planet. The male ejaculation
reflex has been unnaturally cultivated as if female. Never has women's
inferiority to males been agreed with more than by those who claim that the
imitation of male ejaculation is essential to female identity.
Basically, it is not only
homosexuality which is a disorder, but all jaculasis as a social mos is behavioral
pollution which desexualizes mankind; so most of what is called
"sexual" is nonprocreative and nonunitive resulting in
degenderization and sex-as-excretion (first described in my pamphlet Male/Female Differences in Natural Law
of 1993). The outcome of this pollution is self-destruction, cultural
annihilation, misinformation and a porno society, fruitless, loveless,
purposeless, squirting voyeurism causing a massive morbidity of sexually
transmitted diseases, un-being, un-reality, and alienation from the planet.
While some maintain that
homosexuality is a "natural diversity" along with many other bizarre
activities of subhuman animals, the evidence is shaky at best and cannot stand
scrutiny. The book Biological Exuberance:
Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity by Bruce Bagemihl, is a
scientific fraud and hoax as I have reviewed it previously (article available
upon request — to be printed). Indeed, all efforts to "normalize"
homosexuality and other deviant behaviors in nature require sham science and
prevarication with the cognitive deficiencies so common in homosexuals.
If one does not believe the
phenomenological and behavioral fact that homosexuality is a disorder in the
natural realm of the animal kingdom and the planet, then one need look no
further than the intrinsic cognitive deficiencies evident in homosexuals.
No matter how sweet, how shrill,
how squealing, how "fantastically" equal, or how flouncingly
effervescent unlike most others, more differences can be discerned in the
thinking of homosexuals than in the common man (male or female). These
differences are in excess of the common behavioral manifestations of
homosexuality and are cognitive in nature. Cognitive differences are present in
all homosexuality and absolutely document homosexuality to be a disorder over
and above the functional derangement of sexuality. When it is biological,
homosexuality is as much a disorder as diabetes mellitus. When psychological,
it is as much a disorder as an obsessive/compulsive disorder. When psychosocial
as a "choice," it is as much a disorder as any other learned habitual
behavior which interferes with prosocial development and life. When it is a
social phenomenon, it is a cult. Cognitive defects pervade across all
etiologies.
Non-gay homosexuals prove
exceptions, especially those who withdraw and avoid interactions with others as
if embarrassed of their disorder. These homosexuals are the silent ones,
discreet, who will agree with most of this article. They grudgingly accept
their homosexuality as a disorder about which they can do nothing because of
the lack of money for treatment or believing that there is nothing to be done.
They are embarrassed, bewildered, and consider themselves "stuck."
They hope for acceptance and decency and they deserve it. They disdain gay
pride and know all the guy homosexual propaganda is wrong. They avoid speaking
up. They do not like their disorder. They do not want attention. They want to
blend in as if really "normal" which is the normal cognitive reaction
of people with disabilities and disorders. Their resignation is complete. Like
normal people with disabilities, they want to fit in without bringing attention
to themselves. Indeed, these homosexuals are hardly ever recognized. They tend
to be nice people and do well in whatever they do. They know the more obvious
the disorder (those who bring attention to themselves), the more severe the
disorder.
The cognitive defects in
homosexuals are linked to their inability to understand themselves. If unable
to know oneself, one is hard pressed to know what is not self, and, therefore,
cognitive problems occur. Most often there is an impaired capacity for empathy,
and usually cognitively blocked is the ability to understand that others have
appropriate rights, legitimate feelings, and valid activities even if not in
agreement with homosexual cant. Homosexuals typically often have an amazing
simplistic blind bewilderment that someone could even disagree with them.
Parading with prancing and squealing without self-understanding, without
empathy and without tolerance, the cognitive defects will often evoke negative
responses from others. These self-created negative responses are then derided
by another cognitive defect which is defensive labeling, usually a
name-calling, such as "homophobia" (See "Homophobia
Newspeak," Social Justice Review
May/June 1997). But most telling are the occurrences of ipsedixitism, i.e.,
impudent compartmentalized thinking such that truth and reality are excluded: I
say it, therefore it is so. All these occurrences prove that homosexuality is
an objective disorder beyond the unplanetary pseudosexual squirt obsession
(sexcretion) dysfunction.
1. A major art museum hires a
homosexual who is incapable of acknowledging that he has misidentified the
origin of a work of art. He cannot admit he is wrong. He dramatically
manipulates and ebulliently intimidates his colleagues into supporting him. But
he is wrong, and his error can be corrected only after he leaves.
2. A new head of a department
assumes control by removing all colleagues of his department from routine
activities without ever even bothering to meet with them. This is blind social
ignorance and ineptitude. Given positions of responsibility, homosexuals will
often mistreat heterosexuals by what would be clear prejudice if done against
them.
3. Likes attract and such is true
whenever a homosexual is hired. Allow one in and it seems like binary fission.
Soon there will be a disproportionate number of homosexuals far surpassing
their incidence in the general population, and they will promote their cult.
When given power, cognitively blind homosexuals will reverse discriminate
against better qualified heterosexuals, and they will recruit. Whenever there
are more homosexuals together than in the general population, there will almost
always be homotoxicity. This phenomenon is proven in the Girl Scouts. Lesbians
are especially eager to teach young girls the pleasure of being
"male" by teaching them masturbation techniques. Under the guise of
affectionate leadership, girls are quickly taught this male ejaculation-like
pleasure and recruited into the homosexual life-style. The book On My Honor: Lesbians Reflect on Their
Scouting Experience (1997), proves the complete corruption of the Girl
Scouts. Often when the young girls grow up, they are so conditioned by their
male sexual response pattern that they do not even care that they were grossly
recruited into the lesbian life-style. (This is in contrast to males who resent
the idea that they could ever be so recruited. Males tend to resist the idea
that it could happen to them. Female homosexuals, intoxicated by the "male
sex response experience," do not care that they were grossly recruited so
long as they can keep on trying to squirt.) Anyway, to support the Girl Scouts
is to support the corruption of minors and the homosexual cult known as
lesbianism. The Girl Scouts do little but create lesbians, prostitutes,
feminists, and misandrists. In general, when groups of homosexuals get
together, one can expect them to promote their cult. Never has "penis
envy" been more confirmed than by jaculasis in the Girl Scouts and other
lesbian-feminist organizations. The cognitive defect is not only phallophilia
but jaculomania. No doubt all comments for the Girl Scouts also apply to the
American Association of University Women. Like a cancer, homosexuality spreads
itself. (Instead of Girl Scouts, readers should support American Heritage Girls
(513) 563-8244.)
4. Demonstrating massive
self-discrediting intolerance, homosexual journalists and writers are
unmerciful in their judgment and punishment of conservative heterosexual
journalists. Mouthing fairness for themselves, homosexuals are blind to the
self-discrediting prejudiced tyranny coming from themselves. Homosexual
journalists and other murderous writers will rarely cover an issue fairly and
will be editorializing almost constantly. Witness the egregiously skewed New York Times report that the Boy
Scouts were no longer being funded and supported by public agencies. Another
example is the Associated Press (a homosexual organization) giving national
coverage to the murder of a homosexual but not to the savage murder of a
13-year-old boy by a homosexual group. Homosexual reporters, journalists and
editors are totally unreliable and cannot get anything right. They have a
disorder. Indeed, the usual treatment of homosexuals is proof of the
incompetence and untrustworthiness of the liberal press and media.
5. The selfishness of the child
molesting North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is almost
delusional. Incapacity for empathy with normal children and their parents is at
least psychopathic and can rightfully be called a circumscribed fixed
psychosis. Also cognitively blocked into a social psychosis is the delusional
denial that homosexuality can be dangerous. Only homosexual and cult supporters
could ignore that it was a homosexual boys club leader who murdered sixteen
school children and one teacher (and severely injured 14 others) in Dunblane,
Scotland and that most serial killers [appear to? illegible] be homosexuals.
Molesters of school boys are almost [always?] homosexuals. Homosexuals are
sensitive to and understanding of violence only when it is directed against
homosexuals. But savage homosexuals are denied as sex offenders which is a
criminal degree of cognitive blockade endemic to NAMBLA and homosexual cult
supporters.
6. Homosexual bath house
grotesqueries and other "sex outlet/sex relief" excretory activities
(sexcretion) are cognitively blocked from being recognized as bowel movement
like conditioned reflexes. Linked to this is the egregious cognitive defect
that social behavior for homosexuals is called "male bonding" when it
really is a primitive atavistic analog to territorial marking by squirting
subhuman animals. Furthermore, compulsive sexual activity as an excretory
conditioned reflex results in psychological apathy almost proving that there is
no "free will." Indeed, for homosexuals, there is no "free
will" in their fraudulent "choice" because what they are doing
is nothing more than conditioned reflexed gratification (which is not
"freedom") in which the only real choice is: to refuse to go along
with homosexuality by getting treatment to find one's true gender identity.
7. Homosexuals are also cognitively
defective in perception. A jewelry store owner cannot help but put his hands on
someone he is attracted to in a not-so-subtle pretense of sexual come-on but
will dramatically feign denial of any such interest intended when told
"get your hands off of me." After misperceiving someone's interest,
grandiose denial of gross sexual interest is an appalling cognitive defect
characteristic of paraphilia and paraphilia-related disorders with body image
distortions. Homosexuals often perceive people as making passes when they are
not. Others are extremely exuberant in professing their "normalcy."
Others are quite misperceptive in their own sexual organs as being
extraordinarily special.
8. Homosexuals often have trouble
with numbers. For example, they are totally incorrigible in understanding that
their numbers are not anywhere near the widely promoted 10% frequency when the
real incidence is less than 2%.
9. A homosexual cognitive defect
is no more evident than the inability to understand that most of the sexual
acts they perform are incontrovertibly unsanitary public health hazards. The
body is just not meant to be used the way homosexuals use it. None of the other
animals do it except as idiosyncratic antievolutionary infrequent deviancies.
10. Homosexuals are cognitively
blind if not basically phobic about the injury, pain and sadness their families
have about the homosexual life-style even when the family has supposedly
adapted to it. Linked to this is the repeated subtle helpless guilt pressure
and shaming which homosexuals try to use against those who cannot accept homosexuality
except as a disorder. Flagrant self-pity pressure violates decent mutual
respect for those who maintain the truth of what homosexuality is, i.e., a
disorder and a cult.
11. It is a cognitive defect to be
oblivious to the fact that the intense pressure to get others to agree with gay
subculture is a violation of the intrinsic personhood of normals. The pressure
is disarming to those who want to love and nurture positive relationships with
family members and friends who happen to be homosexual. But, basically, the
inability of homosexuals to compromise in mutual respect and understanding is a
cognitive defect. Linked to this is the homosexual corruption of the Boy Scouts
which is a cognitive sin, if not pure evil. To accept homosexuality in the Boy
Scouts is the sanctioning of sex offenders. Indeed, homosexuals have already
reeked havoc on thousands (and some day many men will come forward and name
names if they can get over their embarrassment). Indeed, every experienced
child therapist has treated little boys molested (statutorily raped, really) by
a covert homosexual network already in the Boy Scouts. Such usually occurs at
scout camps rather than at troops' homesites. The destructive impact on these
developmentally vulnerable little boys in states of fluid identity, deserves
capital punishment for the perpetrators. "You did it once, so you are one
of us" is a cult propaganda for the easily influenced. The criminal
homosexual gang in the Boy Scouts promote the concept: "If seduced once,
doubt will be created forever” After seduction, the second recruitment step is
"You were born this way" when in fact, the child has been brainwashed
reminiscent of Chinese indoctrination during the Korean War. Homosexuals
consider the occurrence of the abuse to be proof of the child's homosexuality
and how dare you suppress the child's "coming out!" Using the abuse
event as proof of the child's homosexuality, they claim that there was no
seduction. All this is a denial of personhood by a cultic conversion of little
boys to gender confusion and homosexuality. To pretend this is not so is
pathological denial. Indeed, never contribute to a group or vote for a person
who will not fund the homosexual-free Boy Scouts.
12. Gay Pride (paraphilia) parades
are essentially cognitive defects to the degree of "homosexual coma"
in the Three Stooge genre. To accept what goes on in these events is a massive
cognitive blockade of shame and conscience formation. Really, one must be
cognitively deficient not to understand how flaunting, taunting, squirting
faggots with chains, whips, nakedness and phallocaps are offensive to others.
These "in your face" demands that homoerotic pollution be called
"normal" are clearly impaired reality. It is bizarre that homosexuals
believe that they are not disabled when they must flaunt grotesqueries or play
the victim. Actually, homosexuals are "on stage" all the time by a
fakery fixation, continuous childishness, perpetual playschool, compulsory
thespianism, foppery families, and "let's pretend" life-style. Most
commonly their flagrant effeminacy is an inverted fear of women and they are
trying to demonstrate their harmlessness to the opposite sex (this is in
contrast to lesbians who are eagerly seeking a male pleasure in gross
"penis envy") — in other words, Great Affectations.
13. One cognitive distortion is
their lack of understanding of privacy. While some homosexuals are discreet and
do not try to violate everyone else's standards or create stress in others;
many are flagrant in their impudent [missing] as if the concept of
"privacy" is beyond them. Only the cognitively impaired (or a
cognitively deficient group as a cult) would assault the privacy of others
including disrupting people's religious ceremonies or promoting gross
discrimination against the Boy Scouts when the latter assert their Supreme
Court sanctioned right to free association.
14. The self-promoting stalking
and harassing violence by gay activists is a total cognitive distortion.
Indeed, to view gay togetherness in self-promoting events is like watching a
bunch of unsupervised juvenile delinquents at a Halloween party. The shameless
cognitive deficiency here is fundamentally a blindness to gross anti-social
behavior. Likewise, the introduction of "homosexual education"
programs into elementary schools is sheer corruption of minors, covert child
abuse, dysfunction teaching and propaganda all cognitively deformed into
compulsory masturbation programs known as "sex education." Linked to
this is super sensitivity and criticism in being extremely vulnerable due to
their own insecurity and uncertainty of self which makes them interpret all
disagreements, including all "diagnosis and treatment" efforts as
hostile threats. In gross cognitive deficiency, they proclaim this to be a
"war" and respond with viciousness against the freedom of others.
Some homosexuals seek the International Criminal Court (ICC) intrusion by an
appeal which is itself a war crime against the religious and traditional
beliefs of those who are merely committed to the millennia old truth that
homosexuality is a disorder. One hopes that all Supremacist Courts (which most
of them are) will never lose sight of the Magna Carta.
15. The denial that homosexuality
is abnormal is a cognitive defect. To go around ostentatiously broadcasting their
disorder demanding others accept it as normal is itself a cult like cognitive
dysfunction — or, the same thing, Gay Pride. Homosexuals do not believe you can
tell something is wrong and this may be the biggest Clintonesque cognitive
defect of all.
16. The desire for
"marriage" by homosexuals is a forced altruism, a facade, an
imposture, a pathetic attempt to appropriate a name. One suspects what
homosexuals really want, and are angry in the depths of their souls but cannot
speak truthfully about, is to be a real family man or a real family woman. They
are compelled to pretend. It is truly a cognitive deficiency and a war against
nature to be unable to distinguish black from white, apples from oranges, male
from female, self from childhood misanthrope or marriage from exciting
infatuation. One must be cognitively impaired to claim that a male could marry
a male or that a woman could marry a woman. (Indeed, if this is accepted in
society, then there can be no reason that members of People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals could not marry their pets because the outcome is the same:
unnatural use of genome code function rendering them “out of the universe”. See
my article, “Marriage and Homosexuals”, Social
Justice Review (March/April 1993, 56-57).
17. Another cognitive defect
[missing] stand that love means more than the homosexual definition of love
which is "excitement about helping one another squirt." To the
contrary, love is a transcendental person-to-person commitment and not simply
squirt-to-squirt. Love means sacrifice, going without, and putting up with each
other's ugliness in a reciprocating Beauty and the Beast relationship for
transcendental growth. In opposition, all homosexual studies reveal that
homosexual couplings are rarely anything but impermanent and unfaithful because
of transcendental illiteracy.
17. Homosexuals are cognitively
unable to see the suffering of the children of homosexual couples. Oh, such
children are pressed and must pretend that all is fine to the public and to journalists.
But in the privacy of treatment sessions, children of homosexuals make very
clear how they hate and are hurt, if not disgusted, by the relationships
ongoing in their household. And it is a cognitive defect not to see the tension
in gay parenting because it is clearly different from that of mother and father
together.
18. A major cognitive defect is
evident in homosexuals' inability to remember the origin of their gender
defect. They take the easy way out to convince themselves (like a false memory)
that they were born this way. In fact, proclaiming to be born this way is a
cognitive defect which superficially saves the pain of thinking it through. For
homosexuals, the origin of their disturbance is usually an over-identification
with a persistent childhood "pretend friend" or "pretend
enemy," as the case may be, never outgrown during a vulnerable gender
identity distorting imaginary playmate phase of development reinforced by
homosexual cult recruiters.
19. It is a cognitive defect to
seek more and more intensely erotic substitutes, none of which will sustain
satisfaction, and ignore the unsafe and unsanitary nature of the acts. Linked
is the cognitive defect which projects responsibility onto others and onto
society. Then, further cognitively impaired sua sponte homosexuals want society
to pay for the treatment of their self-induced diseases and high mortality
rates.
20. An unusual cognitive defect
common to homosexuals is best described as the "victimee" concept. A
"victimee" is a person with a self-promoted pretend victimhood
created for selfish reasons. Homosexuals are often "victimees" in
reference to World War. Yes, the Nazis did kill effeminate homosexuals, perhaps
5,000 in number, but at least 5 times that many were "ACT UP"
homosexuals high in Nazi ranks or in Hitler's SS. Not 10% of the men who took
over Germany in 1933 were sexually normal and the evidence for such was burned
in the first notorious "book burning" of the Berlin Sex Research
Institute. The fake victimhood for homosexuals in World War II is clearly a
cognitive defect and an historical fiction.
21. Unable to reproduce, in
cognitive deficiency and relying on the infernal pleasure reinforced
suggestibility of mankind (especially developing youth in normal, fluid
identity stages), lesbians vigorously recruit young women and male homosexuals
recruit young boys [missing] recruiting, homosexuals are unable to recognize
that what they are doing is criminal exploitation and child abuse. Without the
responsibilities of real family people, homosexuals have plenty of money to
promote their cult by pseudosexual social projects at teaching institutions,
neighborhoods, etc. and by the use of expensive legal tactics warping justice
so common in our alleged system of justice.
22. Further cognitive deficiencies
are obvious in the following. Unable to tolerate rejection by others as a part
of freedom, homosexuals respond with faggotism epiphenomena that evoke more
repugnance. Unable to acknowledge an emotion filled inability to think, they ragingly
deny to others the opportunity of making opposing rational claims. Unable to
control feelings, they will not allow others to have feelings counter to their
own. Unable to understand male person-to-person heterosexual bonding, they
respond to it with massive cruising, unperson-to-unperson for any male
possible. Unable to tolerate heterosexual grouping and professing of
traditional manhood, they live out a caricature of "acting up," a
phrase quite appropriate to the childhood false memories and degenderizing
pretend playmates unable to be left behind. Unable to like what is likeable,
they prohibit others from disliking what is dislikeable. Unable to recognize
their own rejecting of normals, gays cannot abide rejection by normals. Unable
to admit to their own phobia of heterosexuality, they project it onto others as
a fiction called “homophobia.” Unable to get the traditional good life benefits
from the gay life-style, they still try to impose it as equal to the
traditional lifestyle. Unable to be secure, gays want sympathetic understanding
and tolerance they themselves are unwilling to give. Unable to be secure in a
pro-social accommodation to others, they use "come out, come on
showboating" to feign how well the world adapts to them. Unable to be
secure in their own being, they develop a repertoire of "look at me"
maneuvers that mock genuine being, and when ignored and mocked back, they end
up angrily offended. Unable to tolerate cure of their disorder, they resist
therapeutic efforts to find their "heterosexuality" and true gender
within.
23. The classic example of
cognitive deficiency by homosexuals is the statement promulgated by the
American Psychiatric Association on December 11, 1998. This cagey statement was
made to reject "reparative therapy" for homosexuals. The illogical
cognitive defects in the statement are well analyzed in my article "The
American Psycho (nee Psychiatric) Association," Social Justice Review May/June 1999. The APA statement is
psychopathologic in its cognitive defects as follows.
The phrase "depression,
anxiety, and self-destructive behavior" is used to negatively describe
occasional phases of reparative therapy when all are also seen with every [missing]
is attributed to reparative therapists but is not recognized as an excommunication
[missing] being in confluence with other social traditions and mores not
universally accepted. The phrase "self-hatred already experienced by the
patient” (meaning a homosexual) is amazingly blind to the identification of
homosexuals as patients who hate themselves. And the phrase "harm caused
to patients" as a possibility by reparative therapy is not seen as an
equally possible occurrence for psychopharmacology, electroconvulsive
treatment, and other psychotherapies. Basically, the statement against
reparative therapy proves the American Psychiatric Association to be a
nihilistic unprofessional banality. Only someone with abnormal thinking would
have promulgated such a statement or missed the logical defects in it as well
as the self-contradictory propaganda promoted. The cognitive deficiencies by
the APA about homosexuality mock psychiatry, profane treatment, and promote
mental illness. As in Nazi Germany, psychiatrists were the first executioners
ever in the medical profession — "sickoanalysis" for sure. If this
APA statement was not written by homosexual psychiatrists, then the cognitive
defects of homosexuality are contagious, not surprising given the infernal
suggestibility of mankind.
25. A final cognitive deficiency
needing to be mentioned is that all of the above will be denied. Indeed, the
problems homosexuals describe with the world around them are really problems
within homosexuals themselves. They cannot understand that they are doing all
of this. This is compounded by the fact that most heterosexual observers just
let it pass because they know to confront and try to correct is to get into an
amazingly intense bewildering cognitively blind hassle. Homosexuals are unable
to understand themselves. This is truly a circumscribed impairment of reality
and cognitive blindness of self-understanding which fosters their inability to
understand others too.
The saddest phenomenon associated
with denial of their disorder is the cognitive denial of comorbid psychiatric
conditions, especially clinical depressions. Every year a young person will
commit suicide which the homophiliacs will blame on society's
"rejection" of homosexuality. But the real cause is
"therapyphobia" rather than "homophobia." Of the 35,000
suicides each year in the United States, those occurring in homosexuals are no
more due to societal attitudes than any of the other suicides or any more than
society's attitudes could cause the occurrences of diabetes mellitus or cancer
in homosexuals or anyone else.
SUMMARY
Homosexuality, as well as all
other contemporary sexcretion, is behavioral pollution, ethological antianimal
kingdom and environmentally against the planet. Mankind is the polymorphous
perverse species filled with "professional wrestlers of sex" on the
way to necrophilia as outcome in a culture of disgust and death.
Furthermore, homosexuals have
emotionally based lack [missing] wherein impudence and grand ipsedixitisms will
pervade by a haughty hostile juvenile anti-intellectual “I said it therefore it
is so!” Ebullient logical fallacies will be offered with any disagreement.
Cognitively deficient, homosexuals are masters of suggestibility and are
erroneously certain of their presentations. They make good "con men"
because they are very convincing. They are often unflappable except to complain
about "rights." There is a sense of entitlement to be different in
anything they aspire to be different in. Just do not call it
"different." Homosexuals are flooded with childish "magical
thinking" projected onto the world around them. They practice
rationalization to avoid treatment.
Homosexuals infiltrate and
metastasize taking over any and every group possible by a compounding of their
cognitive defects. Normal thinking people become bewildered and overwhelmed by
more than one homothinker intractable in their homocant. This has already
occurred in the Girt Scouts, some churches, the fine arts including drama,
painting and sculpture, and almost all psychoanalytic, psychological and
psychiatric organizations. When thwarted, they plead, "poor us"
victimhood. When successful, they play Nazi which is how Hitler started, i.e.,
with a bunch of ACT UP homosexuals.
The cognitive deficiencies in
homosexuals may be rightly described as calculated or thoughtless imprecision
of language with a pretension of scientific objectivity wherein everything has
a double meaning supported by self-appeal with ubiquitous theoretical dissent
from reason and narcissistic escapist mutterings.
All the examples given confirm
abnormalities in the gay way of thinking (which is often not thinking at all,
but rather feeling and cognitive dysfunction). This disturbed way of thinking
is disarming, puzzlingly charming in a bizarre sort of way, contemporarily
"politically correct," and difficult to stand up to, especially when
one is "trying to be nice" or is overwhelmed with the vigorous
imposition of one bewildering effervescent cognitive defect after another.
Normal people cannot stand it, shaking their heads asking "Do I really
have to deal with this day in and day out?"
Homosexual couples cannot stand it
either which is why they rarely stay together even with the mutual squirting
compulsive sexcretory habits they all have. However, the cognitive deficiencies
in both parties of the homosexual couple tend to neutralize each other in their
carrying on. On the other hand, the deformed reasoning and cognitive
deficiencies enable self-neutralization in a strange group-processing phenomena
often evident. Nevertheless, homosexuals' cognitive defects are fundamentally
consistent with an objective psychiatric disorder.
At the individual and personal
level, a homosexual has a deficiency of transcendental intactness and cognitive
dysfunction in that he cannot control himself having capitulated to a
repetition-compulsion (habit and addiction) which he has unfortunately acquired
(1) through developmental factors not his own fault; (2) through acquiescence
and gratification linked to cult recruitment, and (3) to social and cultural
reinforcements. The presence of involuntary emotional expression and the
cognitive defects renders this individual to have an objective disorder or
disease. There should be no condemnation here. The person must be helped and
loved to wellness.
At the social level, gay
homosexuality is a cult — a group-mind control process of persuading and
influencing by untruthful excitement to destructive ends involving
prevarication, deceptive recruitment, intimidating group pressures, and
prohibition of leaving. This cult dimension is to be fought against.
If one wants to overcome
homosexuality, it is a disease and current handicap laws apply. If one wants to
espouse homosexuality, it is a cult to be labeled as such and guarded against.
The espousal of homosexuality by
the press and media is worthy of comment in that the press and media have
become a "fraud institution," not the "fourth estate" but
the "filth estate." Only "abortion" exceeds
"homosexuality" as a topic about which the press and media have been
faithless to its professional principles.
Being aware of what is going on
will help in understanding and dealing with homosexuals in a more forthright
fashion. Genital based life-style (jaculasis) is a fiction. The more disturbed
and obvious they are, the more obvious is their homosexuality and aberrant
thinking. The greater the denial, the sicker one is. As usual, the most
psychopathological aspect of any disorder is its denial.
WHY HOMOSEXUALITY IS A DISORDER
Samuel A. Nigro, M.D.
Social Justice 76 May/June 2001